Partage :

The Ropes
Shall or Will/Must?

By Barbara McClintock, Certified Translator

Bryan Garner, editor, Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th edition, 2014, p. 1585, defines the word shall as follows: “shall, vb. 1. Has a duty to; more broadly, is required to. Ÿ This is the mandatory sense that drafters typically intend and that courts typically uphold. 2. Should (as often interpreted by courts). 3. May. ˂No person shall enter the building without first signing the roster˃. Ÿ When a negative word such as not or no precedes shall (as in the example in angle brackets), the word shall often means may. What is being negated is permission, not a requirement. 4. Will (as a future-tense verb). 5. Is entitled to. Ÿ Only sense 1 is acceptable under strict standards of drafting.”

Despite the editor’s observations about the meaning appropriate for legal drafting, many people believe that “shall” is too pompous and old fashioned for modern-day use, not to mention the fact that it has too many different meanings.

If the French text saysdoit” [present] or “devra” [future] tense, you can simply use must. If you find that must sounds too pushy, there is also will. “Devrait” on the other hand is a conditional which requires should. It takes some getting used to, but the clarity of your document will benefit.

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.

Partage :